|
|
THE
RECOVERY PROFESSIONAL ANALYSES ALUMINIUM CANS
|
|
This article opens
a new section in which we shall analyse different forms of packaging
from the point of view of a recovery professional. In addition to
presenting the advantages and disadvantages of the different materials,
there is also a score sheet for the properties of each type of packaging
material. This takes into consideration that after use this material
goes into a circuit which will enable it to be recovered and recycled.

Aluminium can recovery was started in 1993 and
at present the rate of recycling is around 19% (data from 1997).
The most outstanding characteristic is the high value that this
material fetches on the recycling market, at around 100 Pta./Kg.
(70 cans per Kilo), making it the most valuable form of packaging
produced from household waste.
In
1997 a total of 3,700 million drinks cans were consumed, of which
41% were aluminium, exactly 1,517 million (21,069 tons) generating
a turnover of approximately 500 million.
The
following table analyses and rates various aspects which influence
recovery:
LABELLING: Very good - good. While paper labels on any type of
bottling or canning are normally lost in the recycling process,
cans without labels do not present this problem. The characteristics
and markings are already printed or stamped onto the surface
of the can through a process called serigraphy. This process
uses lacquer microns which light up when the material is
melted. The serigraphy process used on drinks cans such
as Nestea, San Miguel or Estrella Damm beers, in which micro-lacquering
is used on an Aluminium base (giving the cans a metallic
look), are more ecological than cans that are completely
lacquered, such as the Coca-Cola and Fanta cans, etc. |
PULL-TABS: Very good. These form part of the can itself and the
opening mechanism, as they remain attached to the can, they
do not become lost nor do they represent any particular
problem or hazard. |
TRANSPORTING
FULL CANS: Good. Cans represent approximately 33% of
the total product, if we compare them with other containers,
for example glass bottles, cans are much lighter. As a result
of their perfectly cylindrical shape, there is approximately
25% of wasted space between each can. |
GROUP
PACKAGING: Regular. The plastic or cardboard packaging
used to group together four-packs or six-packs of a product
is usually lost due to the problems associated with small
packaging pieces and the scarce response from end users
to recycle this material. In the case of cardboard, this
could be recycled perfectly. In the case of plastics, this
is less ecological, although these days plastics are being
manufactured using biodegradable materials. |
LEFT-OVER
LIQUID: Regular. The characteristic shape of the can
retains a small amount of liquid which means that approximately
1 - 5% of the total contents is not consumed. |
BREAKAGE: Very good. Cans do not present a problem through breakage,
neither when full nor when empty. |
TRANSPORTING
EMPTY CANS: Good. Like almost all containers, cans share
the feature of having very low density, 30Kg/m2. As they
can be flatted easily, their transport capacity can be multiplied
by a factor of five, with a density of 150Kg/m2. Flattening
the cans is advisable and required of the consumer. |
RECYCLING
AWARENESS: Regular - Bad. Through lack of awareness
and the light weight of drinks cans, many consumers underestimate
their value (in spite of the fact that this is the container
with the highest recycled product value) and unfortunately
these cans end up anywhere except in the selective recycling
containers, unless specific recycling campaigns are run. |
CLASSIFICATION
PROCESS: Regular. In principle this depends on the collection
system and on consumer awareness. It is not unusual to find
all kinds of waste deposited in specific recycling containers
for cans or packaging (which could reach up to 50% of the
container's capacity). At present there are several waste
treatment plants incorporating Foucault Separators, technology
that enables mechanical separation of non-ferrous metals,
which is the case with aluminium. This technology is widely
used throughout Europe and at present is being introduced
into Spain, where there are around eight separators of this
type already in operation.
Unless committed and effective consumer collaboration is
stepped up in the future, or a system is introduced where
consumers pay a refundable deposit on cans (as is the case
in some Scandinavian countries where 90% of aluminium cans
are recovered) it will be impossible to increase and improve
classification at source. |
RECYCLING: Very good. The melting down process is simple and does
not involve any difficulty. The differences in quality of
the classified materials only affects the price and its
application, not the final product. Aluminium is such a
versatile raw material that used cans can be recycled and
used to produce new products such as parts for cars, window
blinds or new containers. In addition, it can be recycled
many times over without affecting quality and there is an
energy saving of 95% when aluminium products are manufactured
using recycled materials instead of raw materials (bauxite
minerals). |
|
|